To Treat or Not to Treat M2 Occlusions? The Question (and Answer) From a Single Institution.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Occlusions of the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery may cause significant clinical effects, especially when occurring in the dominant cerebral hemisphere, yet endovascular treatment of these lesions remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To examine the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of M2 occlusions at our institution. METHODS We retrospectively examined radiographic and clinical data of 53 patients presenting with M2 occlusions to our institution. RESULTS Successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction grade 2b or 3) was achieved in 40 patients (76.9%). No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred. The mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at discharge was 6.4 (median, 5.5). In the 38 patients who had follow-up after discharge, the mean follow-up duration was 11.1 months (range, 0.5-36.5 months) and mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 3.5 (median, 1). CONCLUSION The results of our single-institution experience suggest that endovascular therapy for M2 occlusions is safe and effective. Additional evaluation with randomized, controlled studies is warranted. ABBREVIATIONS ADAPT, direct aspiration first-pass techniqueECASS, European-Australasian Cooperative Acute Stroke StudyICH, intracranial hemorrhageIMS, Interventional Management of StrokeMERCI, Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral IschemiamRS, modified Rankin ScaleNIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke ScalePROACT, Prolyse in Acute Cerebral ThromboembolismTICI, Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarctiont-PA, tissue-type plasminogen activator.
منابع مشابه
The “Autonomy Principle” in Islamic Medical Ethics, with an Emphasis on the Qur’ānic Views
One of the important issues in medical ethics is the way of treating and making decision on a patient’s treatment, especially if a physician encounters with some limitations to make a decision. In new medical ethics, the “Autonomy Principle” (respect for patient’s autonomy and individual autonomy) is used to solve the problem; that is, physicians decide on whether to treat a patient or not afte...
متن کامل“Horses for Courses”; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-Faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
This commentary considers the vexed question of whether or not we should be spending time and resources on using multifaceted interventions to undertake implementation of evidence in healthcare. A review of systematic reviews has suggested that simple interventions may be just as effective as those taking a multifaceted approach. Taking cognisance of the Promoting Action on Research Implementat...
متن کاملIt’s More Complicated than That; Comment on “Translating Evidence into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-Faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
In this commentary the findings from a systematic review that concluded there is no compelling evidence to suggest that implementing complicated, multi-faceted interventions is more effective than simple, single component interventions to changing healthcare professional’s behaviour are considered through the lens of Harvey and Kitson’s editorial. Whilst an appealing conclusion, it is one that ...
متن کاملIt Is Not That Simple nor Compelling!; Comment on “Translating Evidence Into Healthcare Policy and Practice: Single Versus Multi-faceted Implementation Strategies – Is There a Simple Answer to a Complex Question?”
Healthcare decisions are often made under pressure, with varying levels of information in a changing clinical context. With limited resources and a focus on improving patient outcomes, healthcare managers and health professionals strive to implement both clinical and cost-effective care. However, the gap between research evidence and health policy/clinical practice persists despite our best eff...
متن کاملThe recent development in synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of small molecule to treat Alzheimer's diseases: A review
Alzheimer's disease is a neurological disorder in which the death of brain cells causes memory loss and cognitive decline. A neurodegenerative type of dementia, the disease starts mild and gets progressively worse. Like all types of dementia, Alzheimer's is caused by brain cell death. The most common presentation marking Alzheimer's dementia is where symptoms of memory loss are the most promine...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Neurosurgery
دوره 79 3 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016